In light of the recent faculty satisfaction survey and the lack of an accompanying staff satisfaction survey, I wanted to paint a picture of some of the things that staff experience while working here at UNCG. It is unfortunate, but bullying is not confined to the upper administration and if we are looking to recreate UNCG as a positive working environment we can neither assume inherent and homogenous benevolence on the part of one part of our community nor complete and unanimous wrong doing on another.
Too many people assumed that by removing Linda Brady, all that had gone wrong at UNCG would disappear. However, there has still been absolutely no acknowledgement by either those who have managed to cling to power or by those who have come to assume it of the wrongs that were done. The absence of any such profession of truth has left some of these bullies with the feeling that their particular brand of abuse is sanctioned and that they enjoy absolute immunity to continue unchecked.
Let me tell you a story:
Once upon a time, in a department not far away there was an administrative assistant named Cordelia*. Cordelia had graciously served the department and was a dedicated and hard working member of the community known as Uncglandia. She made phone calls, scheduled appointments, supervised a band of student workers, and generally made herself most useful. She was pleasant and polite and her value was obvious to all. Well, to nearly all...
You see, in this otherwise idyllic department in Uncglandia there was a creature who could only raise herself up by pushing others down. On the outside, this creature looked very much like any one else, but all those who had come into contact with her over the years had found themselves in a desperate struggle to maintain their sanity in the face of her unpredictable and irrational assaults. Unfortunately, this creature had imbibed of the potion known as 'tenure' and it had caused her become nearly invincible and to further swell with pride.
Innocent Cordelia had come to this department unsuspecting of the nature of this creature. Many of those who had been given this same potion had used its protective power to fight valiantly, to explore bravely, or to create beauty. And so, Cordelia was surprised to find herself the object of its wrath. She began to be ever more fearful as the slightest wind could blow the creature in to breathe fire down her throat, leaving her in tears and the recipient of sympathy from kind, but equally powerless, graduate students.
Whenever Cordelia tried to answer the creature's questions or respond to its baseless accusations, the creature put out her hand and silenced her with a gesture born of her power. The vile words and unreasonable demands could be heard echoing through the hallways, infecting everyone with their poison. It was clear that no matter where this creature resided, it would bring naught but terror, trial, and confusion.
One day, after a particularly bad bout of burning had been visited on Cordelia, a young and noble graduate student dared to comfort Cordelia in her sorrow.
"Is there nothing that can be done to stop these outrages? This abuse of your goodness surely cannot go unchecked!" The graduate student declared.
"Alas," sighed Cordelia, "I believe I must resign myself to my lot as the creature has imbibed from the fountain of tenure. Sadly, there is nothing to be done except for me to contemplate my escape to somewhere more peaceful."
Turning away, she remembered all of the others who had been lost in this same way. Uncglandia was growing weaker as vibrant and vital members of its community were driven to flee from the onslaught of this creature and others like her. Some had appealed to the grand high Vice Chancellor's for help but it had been discovered that they were nothing if not the very source of the corruption in the land. They sanctioned evil actions and punished those who dared cry out and they remained afoot, despite the mysterious disappearances that had troubled their ranks.
I ask you, dear reader, what is to be done? Is Cordelia to be allowed to suffer? Is there no power that can rise and speak the magic incantation that will either banish or cure these terrible creatures?
To be continued...
-----
*names have been changed to protect the innocent.
Showing posts with label UNCG3. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UNCG3. Show all posts
Monday, September 21, 2015
Thursday, September 3, 2015
A Letter of Introduction to Chancellor Gilliam
I decided it was time to introduce myself to the new chancellor and so I have written him a letter. I have sincere doubts that there will be any response, but one is not needed if actions indicate an understanding of the situation.
"Dear Chancellor Elect Gilliam:
"Dear Chancellor Elect Gilliam:
I know we haven't been formally introduced, but I thought it was time to say hello. Your predecessor certainly knew me and the Acting Chancellor has made it clear she is familiar with my work as well. I have had high hopes for you as the first step in a new era at UNCG but am having a somewhat difficult time holding on to my optimism.
Serious damage was done to the UNCG community by Linda Brady and before those wounds can be healed, we are in need of some plain speaking honest dealings. The ugliest of the scars was created by the scandal of the UNCG3. That injury was exacerbated by the mountain of lies that followed it and the complete failure to acknowledge any error on the part of the university administration and board of trustees. Instead, we have seen how executives protect each other and we have been left twisting in the wind.
Your tenure here has started in the midst of lies that you did not create. It is just this distance that should allow you to clear the stables and turn out the darkest pockets of failure and incompetence. Your administration can only ever hope to escape failure, rather than aspire to engender greatness, while truth continues to be ignored.
Your choice is between restoring faith and hope to the employees at UNCG or acting as a plaything for scoundrels.
Choose wisely. And remember, as always, the owl is watching.
Sophie"
Friday, May 29, 2015
When It's All Said and Done
Remember the good old days when we used to be reassured that if we knew everything, we'd be outraged about the heinous crimes of the UNCG3?
I've finally had a chance to see the final report on their nefarious activities and I can testify that it contains not one new piece of information, not one twist, variation, shift, or enhanced explanation. It turns out, we did know everything that the Board of Trustees knew.
Well, with the exception of one thing:
The Board of Trustees didn't know that we knew.
I don't mean 'we' in the sense of the royal we, but rather 'we' in the sense of every member of the campus community. All the while that they were pretending they were right, we all knew they were wrong. Some of us chose to believe that the powerful have the right to be wrong...or at least that if we ignore their wrong, they might shower us with benefits.
So now what? The Board gets to have led us down this disastrous road, shepherded us toward the scandal and acted in every possible way to obfuscate the truth and cover up the lies.
Is it really possible that this group of people should be the ones our new chancellor must work with so closely? They clearly have only their own interests at heart (with the exception of Linda Carlisle who couldn't stomach being part of the whole mudslide). If we are hoping for the spring sunshine, the cobwebs still need to be cleared away.
The absolute refusal to be accountable for their actions and failures does not set the tone for the new administration. Their incredible (by which I mean unbelievable in the true sense of that word) belief that they are immune from the requirement to be responsive to the rest of us is not only disgusting but demands address.
These are not gods, but men and women who hold us in contempt. It's time to for a change.
It's not too late for spring cleaning.
I've finally had a chance to see the final report on their nefarious activities and I can testify that it contains not one new piece of information, not one twist, variation, shift, or enhanced explanation. It turns out, we did know everything that the Board of Trustees knew.
Well, with the exception of one thing:
The Board of Trustees didn't know that we knew.
I don't mean 'we' in the sense of the royal we, but rather 'we' in the sense of every member of the campus community. All the while that they were pretending they were right, we all knew they were wrong. Some of us chose to believe that the powerful have the right to be wrong...or at least that if we ignore their wrong, they might shower us with benefits.
So now what? The Board gets to have led us down this disastrous road, shepherded us toward the scandal and acted in every possible way to obfuscate the truth and cover up the lies.
Is it really possible that this group of people should be the ones our new chancellor must work with so closely? They clearly have only their own interests at heart (with the exception of Linda Carlisle who couldn't stomach being part of the whole mudslide). If we are hoping for the spring sunshine, the cobwebs still need to be cleared away.
The absolute refusal to be accountable for their actions and failures does not set the tone for the new administration. Their incredible (by which I mean unbelievable in the true sense of that word) belief that they are immune from the requirement to be responsive to the rest of us is not only disgusting but demands address.
These are not gods, but men and women who hold us in contempt. It's time to for a change.
It's not too late for spring cleaning.
Thursday, May 14, 2015
Uptick in Retirements and Outsourcing Employment
You may or may not have noticed, but there has been a sharp
uptick in the number of people electing to retire (in addition to all those
‘disappearing’ for other reasons). I would recommend everyone take cover in
June because the stampede of people retiring may be somewhat akin to the
buffalo thundering over the Great Plains.
It’s gotten the point where it would be easier if Campus
Weekly just printed a list of people who were still employed by UNCG.
The most recent person, but certainly not the last, that I
have heard about is the director of undergraduate admissions. She’ll be leaving
in June – seems like Bryan Terry’s aggressive charm may have been too much. Dr.
Terry has terrorized his employees so much that even off the record, they are
reluctant to talk about it. I can see why they would be less than enthusiastic
about the possibility of turning to human resources for assistance…
What kind of impact has his presence had on enrollment? It’s
hard to say, I’m sure there are some specifically worded questions that could
be cagily answered that would address that. I do know that staff enrollment is
declining – maybe we need a vice chancellor for employment enrollment. Oh,
wait. Isn’t that what human resources was supposed to be? Fudge.
Here are some suggestions for administration on how to
stanch the flow of faculty and staff to other institutions:
1. Tag and release. Implant a microchip in the back of the
neck of each person working at UNCG. Then, when they ‘retire’ or ‘move on to
better opportunities’ or ‘escape in the night taking all of their belongings
with no notice’ we can learn where they are and send game trackers to bring
them back to the flock.
2. Dogs. It works with sheep, plus we can have a vice
chancellor of canines then.
3. Fencing. No, not the kind with swords, the kind with
chain link, about 12’ high. Too bad we already built that tunnel under the
tracks, so we’ll have to barricade that now as well. Set up a couple of check
points, give the employees passports and make them check in. Of course, we’ll
have to confiscate all 13’ ladders.
4. Leash laws. All employees found off leash will be subject
to a fine.
5. Incentives. No, never mind, that one’s just crazy.
No matter. We’ll just outsource everything – we’ll become
the first ever residential college with a solely online presence.
Tuesday, April 28, 2015
UNCG's Big Bang
If what Edna Chun says is true, that she was pressured into
revealing names that should have been kept confidential and that she was
working in a hostile work environment, doesn’t that demonstrate that A. there
are significant problems in HR with confidentiality and B. She doesn’t know how
to address the very situations for which she was hired? So, she has admitted failure
(revealing names) and incompetence (inability to address a hostile work
environment). I wouldn’t think she’d need a lot more than that to explain why
she was fired.
And what about Benita Peace in all of this? It would seem to
me that since Chun has been sent packing, Peace should be pushing things into a
suitcase too. If Chun has been fired for the reasons that the university would
like to provide as legal reasons for non-renewal (as opposed to because she was
Asian and 68). After all, the main difference between Chun and Peace then seems
to be age (Peace is 59, Chun 68) and race (Peace is African-American, Chun is
Asian-American).
In which case, Chun is correct, she was treated differently
and is being dismissed as a result of race and age.
I’m sorry, I think I just opened up a wormhole in the
universe.
Let me see if this still makes sense:
Either, Chun was fired because of failure and incompetence
which means that Peace should be fired too.
Or, she was fired because of her race and age, which would
be demonstrated by Peace having not been fired.
So…UNCG should either fire Peace or admit to racism and
ageism…which sounds like a HR problem…and should definitely lead to some lost
jobs for their supervisors as the very things for which they were ostensibly
fired (failure and incompetence.) Which might mean that Charlie Maimone should
be fired (and he’s white, so that would truly demonstrate that the firings
weren’t about race…I haven’t the foggiest idea how old he is). If he isn’t
fired, it must be because Chun is lying…a perfectly good reason to fire her.
Ouch, my head hurts.
Add to that, though, the fact that when Chun was fired from
her position in HR at Broward, she filed a grievance claiming discrimination
AND she was fired because of claims of discrimination.
This is a twisted mess.
I wouldn’t be surprised if even Stephen Hawking wouldn’t be
able to explain UNCG’s Big Bang.
Monday, April 27, 2015
Hope Springs Eternal
We at UNCG have had very high hopes for our Provost (and
current acting Chancellor) Dana Dunn and for Charlie Maimone, the Vice
Chancellor of Business Affairs.
![]() |
| There have been a series of "unfortunate" events... |
Other than Dunn’s spate of hysterics at the last faculty
meeting in which she apparently mistook me for a character from Lemony
Snicket, she generally seems to be much more reasonable than the cabal of
cronies with which we have been burdened for the last seven years. People on
campus still seem genuinely hopeful that she represents a kinder, gentler
administration and I hope they are right.
The same sort of hopefulness was floating in the air in
regards to Charlie Maimone (despite the unfortunate possibilities present when
rhyming his name with “My Money”). His first strike was a vote for a totally
closed search, in direct contrast to the hybrid model for which the faculty
senate had unanimously voted. However, he quickly fell of the radar again amid
the fireworks being set in the rest of the executive administration.
Only now, with Edna Chun’s summary dismissal and her complaint is his name rising to the surface again.
The jury is out. Chun says he created a hostile work
environment and labels him as “instrumental” in the firings of Carpen, Wilson,
& English (the UNCG3). Now, that’s a new twist in the plot, isn’t it?
Is this a woman desperately clawing at others as she falls
from grace? Or is there something more here that needs attention?
Shockingly, Maimone has not responded to the allegations
(probably he has received coaching from UNCG’s spokesperson extraordinaire Joe“no comment” Gallehugh.)
In the same allegations, Paul Mason continues to look like
the bull in the china shop that everybody already knew he was, but now somebody
has actually said it out loud (or in print, which is as loud as we need). This is the first time that anybody in the
upper administration at UNCG has admitted that there might have just been even
the tiniest bit of wrongdoing on Mason’s part.
Those left standing in upper admin and on the board of
trustees at UNCG have been repeatedly told that there needs to be some truthtelling in order for there to be reconciliation. Generally, the response has
been to clamp down completely (for example, to date, the letter that faculty member Hannah Mendoza wrote to the BoT has gone unanswered).
It looks like the truth is going to come out no matter what.
The only question remaining is: how badly do they want to be part of the
reconciliation?
The first step to forgiveness is admitting that you have a
problem.
We’re all ears.
Wednesday, April 22, 2015
Edna Chun’s Sad Tale or As the World Turns at UNCG
All right, I finally did it. I broke down and bought an
ergonomic keyboard. I simply can’t keep up with the pace of the UNCG soap opera
if they are going to keep churning out news at this rate. I really am going to
have to ask for health insurance and a pension if they keep me working full
time like this.
The News and Record reported yesterday that Chun
has filed a grievance with UNCG.
The irony was not lost on me. I think it would have been
considered heavy handed as a story line even in the world of daytime
television, but this is reality where no such bars on the purest melodrama
exist.
Chun’s angle is that she was fired because of her age (68)
and her ethnicity (Asian). She certainly wasn’t fired because of her abilities
(insignificant) or her strength of character (absent).
One of her primary complaints isn’t that she was innocent of
royally screwing up but that she wasn’t extended the courtesy of being allowed
to resign or retire rather than be fired.
Wait, I’m tearing up and I can’t see the screen clearly.
Okay.
In other words, she is the first one that has been dealt
with appropriately. That has got to hurt.
Somebody more fluent than I in the subtleties of this system
might need to fill us in, but I would imagine that if you retire or resign you
get a different set of benefits than if you are fired. At the very least you
get to save face.
Something that doesn’t happen, of course, if you are carted
away in handcuffs and your mug shot is posted for all the world to see.
But I digress.
So, she wasn’t given the velvet handshake. Also, she says,
she doesn’t know why she was fired. And she didn’t have anything to do with the
UNCG3 anyway. And Paul Mason made her do it.
I’m having a hard time processing all of those different
angles at the same time. She didn’t do it, except for that they made her do it,
and she doesn’t know why they fired her, but she didn’t do it anyway, so it
doesn’t matter. I think that’s the argument.
Pulling together all of his talents as a university
spokesman and after a lengthy incantation to invoke the muses, Joe Gallehugh
responded bravely on behalf of UNCG with words that are sure to echo through
the ages much as the speeches recorded by Tacitus in his Histories that the
university couldn’t comment.
Chun is showing some backbone in refusing to allow others
off the hook and go silently. Of course, it would have been helpful earlier if
she had brought it to the public’s attention that Paul Mason had demanded to
know the names of those who had filed grievances against him and pressured her
to dismiss the matter. Also, apparently her supervisor, Charles Maimone created
a hostile work environment – something Chun suddenly seems to clearly understand.
But if she wants to call out the whole rat’s nest, I would
advise everyone to put on goggles and gloves because it’s going to get dirty.
Maybe Lyda Carpen can offer Chun some pointers about going
through the grievance process. But I wouldn’t be surprised if Carpen is too
busy these days to have time to help.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)





