I hate to be the bearer of bad news so early in 2015, but
really it’s not new. Do you remember all those times that you kept working at
UNCG even though you were told there was no money to give you a raise because
you valued the community you belonged to and you knew we were all having to
‘tighten our belts’ to get through these ‘tough financial times’?
Well…It turns out there was plenty of money. There were a
fair number of raises too. Some of them were really small – hardly enough to
compensate for increases in health care co-pays. Some of them were pretty
significant. The big raises went to those who needed them the least while the
rest of us were left making less than we had the year before.
Laura Young, Associate Vice Chancellor for Business Affairs
got a measly $2,500 raise. Of course, when you realize she was making $125,580
and went to $128,092 some of your sympathy might evaporate. During the same
period, Jill Yesko, a public communication specialist also got a raise from
$41,923 to $42,231 – doesn’t it seem like the $2,500 that Young got would have
made a much bigger difference to someone like Yesko? Especially given that
Yesko started only one year later than Young. After all, if we were all
tightening our belts, why doesn’t the top have to tighten as much as the
bottom?
Alan Boyette has seen his salary rise from $208,438 in 2008
to $221,486 in 2014. In other words his raise has been from ½ to 1/3 of the
salary of many of the employees at UNCG.
Michael T. Byers, for being such a good friend and lackey
during the first phase of the take over of Glenwood has moved from a
comfortable $103,910 to $127,285 from 2008 – 2014. This was before deciding to
jump ship as he watched the waters rise. Apparently, the work of Willie Brown,
dedicated UNCG employee since 1999 wasn’t worth rewarding with more than a
pittance in 2008 (less than $700) and yet Byers received a raise the size of
Brown’s entire yearly salary.
Who is still here and working hard for UNCG? Willie Brown,
of course. Byers leapt at an opportunity to get away before trouble started to
rain down on his head for all the sleazy dealings in Glenwood. As Byers once
said, “No matter how many showers I take, I just can’t get clean.” And that’s
where we invested the university’s money. Why? Because that’s where the
administration wanted to spend it.
We’ve been tightening our belts not because there isn’t any
money but because this administration has decided that the people who do the
work of UNCG, the ‘little people’ don’t deserve it. Instead they reserve it for
lackeys and friends and as a way of buying the loyalty of those who are willing
to sell it. This doesn’t mean that everyone who has gotten a raise has sold
themselves. What it means is that every raise given is an attempt to buy that
person. Some of that, I’ll have to address in a separate post when we look at
who was cleared out by new managerial appointments under Brady (in other
words…stay tuned.)
Of course, we’ve already seen the meteoric rise of Cheryl
Callahan from the near starvation level salary of $140,000 per year to her
current $188,181. It should come as no surprise then that she seems to have no
idea either that students often have to take out loans in order to go to school
at UNCG or how those loans might be structured. This is especially unfortunate
given her position as Vice Chancellor of Student Affairs, but when asked at a
meeting about student fees in regard to the new rec center, she was unable to offer
even any embarrassment over her ignorance in that regard.
Now, the reason that I bring any of this up is because, as
has been said by others before, education at UNCG is not under attack, it is up
for sale. And if you are not willing or simply able to aide those who would
sell it then you will not be treated kindly. The real ‘crime’ that the UNCG3,
and the rest of those who suffered banishment from University Relations (as
well as those cleared out of athletics and advancement), are being punished for
is an inability to make villains appear to be heroes and an unwillingness to
quietly submit to making a lie of all of the good that UNCG has been. Cheryl
Callahan and Michael Byers had no such compunction.
The positions involuntarily vacated in University Relations
are now being brought back into being, reclassified as EPA (Exempt from
Personnel Act) which will make them that much easier to clear out should any
new employees prove to have the same lack of moral flexibility that was
demanded of those who previously held them.
Just as we are seeing struggles across the country by those
working in minimum wage positions for reasonable pay and greater job security,
those very basics are being cut out from under the feet of every employee at
UNCG. And so, we lose those who are dedicated or we grind them into the dirt,
while raising those who are willing to abandon their principles or unable to
take the risk of refusing to participate.
This slide down must be addressed in order for it to be
reversed. We can’t strike, but maybe we can slow down?
It’s just a thought.
There is more to the leaning toward EPA than the ease of getting rid of someone, by the way. According to state rules, SPA positions must be paid within a salary range based on skill level and competency. These are established and published ranges and the hiring range cannot undercut the state established value. Unless, the position is written as EPA. Then the salary, which is commensurate with experience, can't be below the federal Fair Labor Standards Act minimum for exempt employees of $23,600 per year (no matter how many hours they work). This is why you may find a program being run by a 22 year old 'Director' with a degree but no experience for $24,000 annual instead of a program specialist at a minimum of $31,888 (the accepted 20% below fair market for state SPA employees). You see this also in Enrollment Management where they have been trying to justify Admissions Counselors as having EPA decision-making authority because they are comparing high school students transcripts to rubrics and 'making a decision' that they meet the minimum requirements for someone else to make the actual academic decision regarding their admission. Sneaky.
ReplyDelete